<![CDATA[Going True Green

<![CDATA[Going True Green - GTG Blog]]>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:21:41 -0400Weebly<![CDATA[Telling Studies for Climate Conditions at Jesus' Crucifixion]]>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 04:00:00 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/telling-studies-for-climate-conditions-at-jesus-crucifixion

Mt. Kenya Park

To have a better understanding of Ground and Climate Conditions in Jerusalem two thousand years ago we have to include the results from studies done by Prof. Aldo Shemesh, head of the Environmental Sciences and Energy Research Department at the Weizmann Institute of Science. He collected core samples from the glacial lake, Hausberg Tarn, on Mount Kenya. These samples provided us with strong evidence for what the ground temperatures would have been in Jerusalem 2,000 years ago.

Also multiple studies have been done by different Institutes from around the world on soil layers at Ein Gedi Spa, near the Dead Sea. These layers have been recently exposed by that area's current changing climate causing the water to recede. The layers of soil demonstrates that several times in the past the waters have receded like today. The layers also give us a time frame for when certain events occurred, such as earthquakes and dust storms.

Also do we have any evidence to what date Jesus was crucified and what is that evidence based upon?
First a set of criteria has to be met and work in tandem to provide a date for Jesus' crucifixion:

·      Historical archeological and written evidence that Pontius Pilate was ruling Judea.

·      Multiple Jewish holidays all occurring on the same weekend. Only two years are coinciding with these criteria: AD 30 and AD 33.

·      Celestial positions of moon and sun over Jerusalem on said date are confirmed with modern computer accuracy for only 33 AD.

·      Celestial calculations incorporate the Delta T equation, showing adjustments for all the changes in Earth’s orbit around the sun over 2,000 years. End results give us a Blood Red Moon over Jerusalem right after sundown on the evening of the crucifixion. Again, only in 33 AD.

·      Additionally, from peer reviewed scientific research we have samples from soil layers at Ein Gedi Spa, near the Dead Sea. These layers have been recently exposed by that area's current changing climate causing the water to recede. The layers of soil demonstrate that several times in the past the waters have receded like today. The layers also give us a time frame for when certain events occurred, such as earthquakes and dust storms. Dating the layers shows disturbed soil from an earthquake dated to AD 33. On top of the disturbed earthquake soil is a layer of dust from a dust storm with pollen that comes from plants that pollinate in the Springtime. (April) Therefore, confirming an earthquake and a dust storm event that blocked out the sun for three hours in the afternoon.

·      Only year to meet all the above is AD 33. The date for all this is: Friday, the third of April, 33 AD.

Good Friday this year is on the date that scientific evidence gives the most credence as the actual date Jesus was crucified: AD 33, Friday, April 3rd.

For my video presentation done at the 2025 International Shroud Conference presenting my work and thesis at St. Louis, please use this LINK:
Coinciding Historical, Environmental, Geological, and Celestial Data with Gospel Writings

Thank you.

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

]]><![CDATA[Home Made Maple Syrup]]>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 14:30:00 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/home-made-maple-syrupSpringtime is here and Maple Trees are sending their Sap upward to create new leaves on their branches. AND that means we can access some of that Sap to make Maple Syrup.

So sit back and enjoy this short video a colleague sent me about his efforts to make "home made" Maple Syrup...

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

]]><![CDATA[Food Labels Decoded, Pastured & Pasteurized]]>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 05:00:00 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/food-labels-decoded-pastured-pasteurized Pastured & Pasteurized

Pastured, pasture, pasteurized, flash pasteurization, pasteurization, pasture raised

Both of these are a fast break-down to what the label tells us:
First know with Pasture labels there are no independent certifications of this label. So we don't know for sure if the label was just slapped on or actually tells us that the animals were free to move about their natural habitat and eat grass or plants that are normally consumed.

Pasteurized for Eggs, Apple cider, milk, juices, etc. means the product has been exposed to high heat to destroy potential bacteria. Pasteurization may reduce the amount of vitamins in the eggs, as well as nutrients in milk and juices. Flash Pasteurization means extremely high heat for a shorter period of time. The vitamins and nutrients are still at risk.

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

]]><![CDATA[Roundup the Coverup?]]>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 05:00:00 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/roundup-the-coverup

Roundup, glyphosate, herbicides, carcinogenic, going true green, weeds, getting rid of weeds, weedkiller

Spraying Crops

Way back in the year 2000, a study was done that produced a published paper that contended the active ingredient in Roundup, glyphosate, did not cause cancer.

Today, because of the discovery showing previously hidden or ignored emails that present undisclosed industry involvement, numerous oversight lapses and undisclosed connections with Monsanto who manufactures Roundup, that paper for the year 2,000 has been officially retracted! "Serious ethical concerns" has been cited as one of the reasons.

Apparently investigators found evidence that Monsanto employees participated in drafting the study's paper and perhaps payments were made to the authors. Thus, destroying all the paper's research and bringing the paper's integrity into question. There was no true transparency about who and how this paper came about.

Last year in 2025 we have different independent studies that were published linking glyphosate exposure to increased cancer risks. All this new information brings me back to my GTG blog called: Homemade Weed Killer on July 9, 2014. By just using some common sense, we have an effective alternative to store bought weed killers.

A herbicide's job is to kill and while it may not kill us immediately, it sure may cause damage that can lead to what we have seen over the decades. The evidence for herbicide's carcinogenic potential is very strong. Enough Said.

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

BBV Publishing, L. J. Williams, Telomere, Upper Room The Way

TELOMERE, by L. J. Williams "Telling The Untold Stories™ BBV Publishing

]]><![CDATA[An Energy Mole Among Us]]>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:00:00 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/an-energy-mole-among-us

Prior to 2010 I received many invitations to Energy Conferences. One was to the Copenhagen 15 session hosted by Forbes and Shell Oil. The other day I was meeting with some colleagues and I recalled the Energy Conference event with Shell Oil at Post University in New York so many years ago.

I arrived early and this afforded me the time to meet some of the speakers on the panel before the event started. While the rest of the arriving audience, all of us in business attire, went directly over to the morning setup of bagels and coffee, I waited to speak with the Vice President from Exxon. However, he was more interested in getting "back-stage" and away from everyone than doing any networking. His arrogant attitude prevailed and he didn't "need" to network with anyone at this event. Thus, our exchange or conversation, if you can call it that, was insignificant.

The panel spoke up to 10:45am with the VP from Exxon speaking last. While there was an advocate for electric cars on the panel, this VP from Exxon shot him down immediately when he spoke last just before our scheduled time for a break. The VP set himself up for a "drop-the-mike" ending by ending with the following line:

"You cannot pour technology into a gas tank to run a car!" Everyone laughed. I didn't.

The MC then made the mistake to say, "Before we take our morning break, are there any questions for our distinguished members of the energy panel?"

My right arm and hand went straight up and I started to wave. I could not be ignored and I was acknowledged.

"Thank you," I replied. "My question is for Exxon's vice president... Can we not eliminate the pouring by applying the technology of clean hydrogen fuel cells operating on demand as we drive after collected FREE rain water that was put into a vehicle's water tank? And as needed, the membrane component of the fuel cell on the car, will separate the two hydrogen molecules from the one oxygen molecule. Therefore eliminating any need to get hydrogen molecules from natural gas or gasoline. This hydrogen separation procedure would be done with FREE electric power created from the Sun with solar cells embedded in the roof and hood of the car. The FREE hydrogen will run the fuel cell that makes FREE electricity to power the our cars as needed, so we do not have any storage to cause any type of Hindenburg explosions. And the byproduct is water condensation."

Everyone had turned in their seats to look back at me, many with their mouths hanging open. This did not go unnoticed by Exxon's VP. He first stared, then chuckled, followed by a quick, "That technology doesn't exist and probably will never exist."

"Oh, then how are we able to use that technology on our Space Shuttles since 1981, where three hydrogen fuel cells are onboard. One to provide all the electric power the space shuttle needs and two for back-ups?"

The mike dropped, but I was the one to do the dropping. The room went silent. Then the MC grabbed his microphone and quickly said, "We are short on time, so let us all take that coffee break now... Thank you." Over two dozen hands went up, everyone else started talking. "Coffee and danish cakes are available in the other room to your left," continued the MC as the panel of speakers exited the room. Leading the way was the Exxon VP. "Thank you, please be back here at 11:00. Thank you."

After collecting my note pad, I was one of the last to enter the break room. Immediately I was surrounded by ten or more people. The conversation about hydrogen fuel cells abound. After three minutes or so, the group of people around me grew in size. Then from a back door a short man wearing an expensive suit and shoes entered the room. He wore a navy blue suit and a bowtie, he had a smile bigger than he stood tall. He was a phony, he was a mole. I say mole, because as I spoke I saw him walk around the room and listened to every conversation going on in the other 5 or so circles or clicks that formed. When he arrived at my circle last, he heard fuel cells and moved into the circle! He didn't walk away like I notice him do with all the other groups of people talking.

As soon as he had the opportunity to jump my spoken words, he did with... "All this you are talking about is not real, don't listen to this." He directed to everyone standing around me. "None of this will ever work and you are all wasting your time listening to him."

Immediately I replied, "When you say this technology will never work, or will never happen, isn't that similar to what the Wright brothers heard? Didn't people say we would never walk on the moon? And how is the fact that today this technology is working on our Space Shuttles?"

The mole lost his big smile and said, "You don't know what your are talking about!" He then turned away hoping others would follow. None did, and when he turned back, he saw nobody else walked away, but started asking me more questions.

I addressed what just happened. "That man was a planted mole to influence and listen to our conversations." People were shocked to hear my accusation, but I found myself followed by that planted mole at lunch time and later in the afternoon.

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

]]><![CDATA[Food Labels Decoded, Organic]]>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 16:16:39 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/food-labels-decoded-organic Omega-3 Enriched

Going True Green, Organic, organic certified, organic label

Knowing that an Organic or 100% Organic label is certified by having government approved agents inspect the farm producing the food makes this label the best one to have. Since 2002 USDA organic standards must be met by the farm or company producing the food. Additionally, they must also be certified so they are maintaining the specific regulations to be organic.

Organic foods must be produced without any pesticides, man-made fertilizers, ionizing radiation, bioengineering and any genetically modified material. Meats that are labeled organic, along with eggs, poultry and dairy products must come from animals that have not received any antibiotics or growth hormones.

Unfortunately there are three different categories that are confusing:
- "Made with Organic Ingredients" means that the product must have at least 70 percent of organic ingredients.
- "Organic" means that the product must have at least 95 percent of organic ingredients.
- "100% Organic" is the best way to go if you are not growing the food naturally yourself. These products must only have 100% organically produced ingredients.

With EGGS, Organic means the USDA Organic seal must be shown. This verifies that the eggs meet the organic standards including coming from uncaged hens that are free to roam and have access to the outdoors. Also the hens must be fed an organic diet of feed produced without conventional pesticides or fertilizers. (Check my previous blogs on these labels)

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

]]><![CDATA[Food Labels Decoded, Omega-3 Enriched]]>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:43:59 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/food-labels-decoded-omega-3-enriched Omega-3 Enriched

We need to have a "base-line" understanding for Omega-3 Enriched labels. The food label for Omega-3 Enriched must have the specific amounts of EPA, DHA, or ALA. These amounts are often an addition to the main Nutrition Facts label or panel. The FDA restricts direct claims such as: "Good Source of EPA", because manufacturers are only allowed to list the quantity with the full name.

Therefore, look for the full names of EPA aka Eicosapentaenoic Acid, DHA aka Docosahexaenoic Acid, and ALA aka Alpha-Linolenic Acid, along with stating where the source is from:
fish, algal oils, flaxseed, or walnuts
The serving amounts should be also listed by saying the amount of "mg" per serving or "Contains flaxseed for Omega-3s."

When the label states that the Eggs are "Enhanced with Omega-3 fatty acids" that means the chickens were given feed with ingredients such as flax seeds or fish oils to increase the omega-3 levels in their eggs. Additional examples from an orange juice carton will state: "Contains 250 mg EPA & DHA" and from a cereal box: "Rich in Omega-3s from Flaxseed" will be stated on the box.

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

]]><![CDATA[Food Labels Decoded, Hormones]]>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 18:49:52 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/food-labels-decoded-hormones Hormones

What is the story with our Food, A.K.A. Chicken and Eggs?
What is the truth about Chickens and Eggs? Hormones and Our Food?

No hormones? This label is misleading and strictly used as a marketing gimmick. Cutting straight to the facts - FDA prohibits the use of hormones in chickens. All eggs and all chicken products are always hormone-free.

A "no hormone" label means no synthetic hormones were added, however the term is misleading. Animals produce hormones naturally! Additionally, the label is redundant because adding hormones are illegal and not allowed by the U.S. Government. For beef, it signifies no growth hormones were used, but doesn't cover using antibiotics!

Better labels to look for are Organic, Certified Humane, and Grassfed. Also note that the term and/or fake label stating, "No Hormones" isn't approved by the USDA, because all animals naturally produce hormones.

Merry Christmas everyone and a Blessed New Year !

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

This Christmas Read About A Burial Cloth Truth That Started With Swaddling Clothes On The First Christmas And Began Anew On The First Easter !

]]><![CDATA[Enviro and Energy Saving Christmas Check List]]>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 05:00:00 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/enviro-and-energy-saving-christmas-check-listA blessed and merry Christmas to all. Here is a Christmas Check List to save money, energy, and earth this and every Christmas !

]]><![CDATA[The Earth Is Tilting !]]>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 05:00:00 GMThttps://www.goingtruegreen.com/gtg-blog/the-earth-is-tilting

A Going True Green member emailed us about an article called:

“Earth Has Tilted 31.5 Inches. This Shouldn’t Happen.”

From what I can tell this was re-published on AOL.com from Popular Mechanics. The article went on to blame the pumping of drinking water out of the ground for the disturbance of balance and the tilting of the Earth’s axis.

With a more complete picture of details and facts, which the article avoided, we know from geological and environmental data that this is NOT the reason for the tilt. All water pumped out is REPLENISHED with rainfall and melting snow. This cycle has been going on for thousands of years. Now there are some issues being caused by pumping out drinkable water and they can be found on overdeveloped small islands. With all the blacktop and pavement, natural replenishment of the water removed is severely decelerated. This plus the weight of Highrise buildings, such as hotels, is causing the land to sink. In these cases, any claims stating the ocean is rising, are incorrect. The land is sinking.

So, what is the most probable cause for the Earth’s axis tilting 31.5 inches?

Our planet’s inner iron and nickel core if rotating or flipping. Geological evidence has shown that this has happened about 25 times since humankind walked on this planet and we survived. As this occurs again, and not one person knows when or how long this event will last, many scientists have surmised that this is the cause for Earth’s tilt or movement of Earth’s axis. When the event is over, every compass will point to the South Pole instead of the North. This event can and will cause many issues:

Bumble Bees will need time for re-orienteering, our protective magnetic field surrounding the Earth may shift causing electronics to fail unless we protect them. More shelters with protection from the sun may become necessary if we have an increase in solar radiation for an unknown period of time. Nevertheless, humankind has survived this at least 25 times before and without any prior knowledge or modern science to help.

There was a time when a kid could learn many facts from periodicals such as Popular Mechanics, but that was decades ago. Sadly today, the articles are sensationalized to get followers, sell ads, and make money.

Bill Lauto, at GoingTrueGreen.com
Environmental Scientist
International Sustainability and Energy Consultant
Contribute your comments!

]]>